the meaning of life Essay example -- essays research papers

                    The Meaning of life     What is the substance of life. The meaning of our lives, the purpose, and the dreams both dashed and realized, and the expectations forced upon us by others. In other words how do you " retell" what life is? "Translation" means to explain in simple terms. What is it supposed to be about? There ar different answers for different people at different times in their lives. A persons lifetime is filled with self-examination. Why am I here? What am I doing? Is this as good as it gets? You have a beginning. Youre in the middle, and your story hasnt ended yet.If one would recognize the greatest things we have in life, they would not be asking this question. These great things are faith, hope, and love. Faith is the one that can keep one from asking questions. If God wanted us to know something, then we would know it. In most religio ns, Christian ones in particular, the question of meaning in life is inextricably wrapped up in a relationship with God. Living in, for, with, and through him. Therefore, how one answers the meaning of life question bears directly the existence of God.Soren Kierkegaard said to be the "father" of existentialism maintains that there are three basic answers to the question of the meaning of life. He called these "stages" of life, because he believed that people "progressed" from one stage to the next. Whether or not that is true, there do seem to be at least three fundamental outlooks on life. One is a life devoted to pleasure. This value perspective can be shown by a person whose only concern is for what they are doing now. They would kinda gain from pleasures in life without any regards to how they might affect their future.Another stage is those choosing ethical and moral paths. People who are honest and loyal try this in their everyday lives. Finally, ther e is a live religiously. This has been the popular modal value of life for legion(predicate) of us. It is going to church and practicing your faithStace argues, the present age has begun to buffer faith in God. The concept of a supernatural person has begun to seem unlikely to many people. The Bible no longer seems as respected for many Catholics. While many peopl... ...ve the opportunity to choose either Him or evil, thereby proving our love for Him. If His were the only game in town, then there would not be a free will conscious choice for Him.It is evident that the meaning of life has to far to complex for any one to fully understand or agree on the same answer. All these ideas of these different philosophers are not necessarily inaccurate, just incomplete. All pieces to a puzzle that one has no way of fully figuring out. No one has seemed to accomplish this yet in life. There are so many obstacles that we face as we try to action a higher good. Many of these are based in the fact that we are human beings, and because of that are flawed by the shipway of our culture. Things such as self-doubt, worry, ignorance, and the values put into our heads since the day we were born all are roadblocks on our way to a higher level. Also being human beings makes vulnerable to the ways of the world around us, so it is not easy to block these things out of our lives. This life is a stage in which we are to develop our minds, bodies, and souls to their highest potential in preparation for the afterlife. Only God could ever really show anyone true meaning.

Modernist Style in Joseph Conrads Heart of Darkness :: Heart Darkness essays

Modernists Experiments in Heart of Darkness   In Joseph Conrads Heart of Darkness, a chaotic form of writing takes place which is characteristic of the Modernists experiments in their style of literature of stream-of-consciousness.  Written before WWI took place, he spoke of a different type of chaos and uncertainty present in the world at this time the issue of slavery.       Heart of Darkness describes a voyage to Africa, common for the British still, despite the horrific treatment which was apparent of colonization.  The chaotic, stream-of-consciousness style Conrad took on helped to pageantry the confusion, and made the reader have to witness for themselves what they thought the writer meant.  Conrad experiments with this style, leaving some sentences without ending not a sentimental pretense but an thoughtsomething you can set upand offer a sacrifice to. (Conrad, Longman p. 2195), a very choppy form of literature and causes the reader to fill in the holes and interpret themselves, alone.  Conrad skips about from talking of the two women knitted black wool feverishly at the gate of the city (of hell), to his aunt which he feels women are out of belief with truth, to how the British are as weak-eyed devil(s) of a rapacious and pitiless folly (Conrad, Longman pp. 2198, 2199, & 2202).  Conrads mind moves about as ours do along a cosmic duration of literary monologue to convey to the reader the authors ideas, as interpreted by the reader.       Conrads narrative frame also continues his experimentation with literary form in Modernist style.  Two separate monologues are present throughout Heart of Darkness.  The first part starts out with an unnamed narrator aboard the ship Nelly, describing to himself, as wholesome as to the reader, those aboard the ship, particularly Marlow.  At first, the narrator is not known for sure to be a character aboard the ship until a a couple of(prenomi nal) paragraphs later identify him as a person observing the others-Between us there was, as I have already said, (Conrad, Longman p.

Modernist Style in Joseph Conrads Heart of Darkness :: Heart Darkness essays

Modernists Experiments in Heart of Darkness   In Joseph Conrads Heart of Darkness, a chaotic form of writing takes place which is characteristic of the Modernists experiments in their style of literary productions of stream-of-consciousness.  Written before WWI took place, he spoke of a different type of chaos and uncertainty present in the world at this time the turn of slavery.       Heart of Darkness describes a voyage to Africa, common for the British still, despite the horrific treatment which was appargonnt of colonization.  The chaotic, stream-of-consciousness style Conrad took on helped to display the confusion, and made the ref have to interpret for themselves what they thought the writer meant.  Conrad experiments with this style, leaving some sentences without ending not a sentimental pretense but an ideasomething you can do upand offer a sacrifice to. (Conrad, Longman p. 2195), a very choppy form of literature and causes the reader to fill in the holes and interpret themselves, alone.  Conrad skips about from talk of the two women knitted black wool feverishly at the gate of the city (of hell), to his aunt which he feels women are out of touch with truth, to how the British are as weak-eyed devil(s) of a rapacious and pitiless folly (Conrad, Longman pp. 2198, 2199, & 2202).  Conrads mind moves about as ours do along a large duration of literary monologue to convey to the reader the authors ideas, as interpreted by the reader.       Conrads narrative frame also continues his experimentation with literary form in Modernist style.  Two start monologues are present throughout Heart of Darkness.  The first part starts out with an unnamed narrator aboard the ship Nelly, describing to himself, as well as to the reader, those aboard the ship, particularly Marlow.  At first, the narrator is not known for sure to be a character aboard the ship until a few paragraphs later come u pon him as a person observing the others-Between us there was, as I have already said, (Conrad, Longman p.

Is There Sufficient Evidence in Sources D-I to Explain Why the Troubles Broke Out in 1969? Essay

IntroductionThroughout history England has ruled Ireland. For Over 300 years there has been conflict between Catholics and Protestants. The whole conflicts was rooted in religion, exactly within the last centaury the troubles have escalated to include political and economical issues for example in 1921 Protestants set down things comparable the penal laws in the 17th centaury, Catholics were excluded from authorities they were treated as if they were below Protestants. Problems like this have led Catholics fighting for what they believe is right and for their equality, they have give tongue ton this in non-violent and violent forms hotshot example is bloody Sunday in 1969. In 1918 Ireland was partiti aced into Northern Ireland and Southern Ireland. Ireland was split into three separate parties Nationalists were home rule and to be part of the British Empire, Unionists were to be entirely ruled by Britain, Sinn Fein were to be entirely independent with their own government and rules.In the following essay I am going to describe and esteem pedigrees D-I in telling us why violence erupted in 1969. I will be exploring the obtains reliability, accuracy, whether it is fact, whether it is biased and basically discussing whether they be reliable evidence to show us exactly why the trouble did brake out in 1969. etymon DSource D is an adaptation written by a Catholic complaisant rights spokes person named B Devlin in 1969. B Devlin based this objet dart of writing on how a young Roman Catholic discipline girl described her days. Source D tells the reader nearly how the vice principle of St Patricks Academy, Mother Benignus felt towards the English and Protestants, as well as how she gave her opinion to the students of her school. Mother Benignuss opinion was that protestants may have been powerful but they certainly were non Irish. This woman was brainwashing her students into learning about the splendour of Catholics and Ireland and the wonderful histor y behind it, make them believe that protestants and the English are horrible.Does Source D Show Why Violence Broke Out in 1969?Source D is biased therefore comes across as anti-protestant, there are no other point of views about protestants in this rise. Because of this we can not trust B Devlins adaptation, it is not reliable containing to a greater intent of someones opinions rather than factual dates, condemnations or places. The semen does tell us that B Devlin adapted this ancestor natural endowment us evidence that she may have taken this bug from a school girl but past possibly changed the cite to create an even more anti-protestant view therefore making it biased. We know this could be true because B Devlin was a Catholics Civil Rights spokes person. This showtime shows no violence, unless because the students were being brought up with an anti-protestant attitude this could lead to a future violent scene. My opinion is that this source is unreliable there are no dates apart from when it was written, and the source contains no factual proof.Source ESource E is a nineteenth century protestant cartoon. It was drawn by a protestant artist. The cartoon shows Erin, the lady of Ireland dressed in rags she holds her head down as if she is ashamed and also looks upset. Erin has been tied up in rope by the Catholic priest she is being punished. The Catholic priest is dressed smartly, he looks angry and in control of the situation. This source symbolizes the religious tension between Catholics and Protestants during that time period, giving the effect that Catholics have taken charge of all the churches.Does Source E Show Why Violence Broke Out in 1969?This source is biased towards the protestant point of view. The cartoon shows a protestants view on how the Catholics treated them, how they took control of all Protestants. They achieve this by giving the effect that protestants are innocent, also that Catholics are rich, evil people who try to make p rotestants lives a misery.During the time this source was drawn, Catholics were against Protestants and were ruling Ireland. This source does not contain violence however it could lead to violencebecause Catholics would want revenge for the externalize they are known as. I would not trust this source considering that it was drawn by a protestant and effectively tells us that all Catholics are out to get Protestants.Source FSource F is a map showing the Gerrymander in 1966. A Gerrymander is to divide an area into election districts in such a way, as to give one political party an electoral advantage. The map tells us that in 1966 the population of Derry was 30376 people it goes on to tell the reader that 20102 were Catholics and hardly 10274 were Protestants, telling us that during 1966 Derry was a catholic dominated area.Does Source F Show Why Violence Broke Out in 1969?Source F is a reliable piece of information because it is a map. From this we know that all the data that is wri tten, is known as fact. The source uses completed pieces of data involving numbers of the population and dates, as well as giving us a clear view certain roads in Derry this includes Strabene Road, Irish Street and Urrivady Road. Although this map does not show any signs of violence, it is because of sources like this that we understand why there were Catholic protests in 1969, two years by and by this source was created. The map contains some writing telling us that more Protestants than Catholics became boundary commissioners because most Catholics refused.A piece of the paragraph then says, The boundaries of the constituencies favored Protestants this tells us that the Protestants have Gerrymandered the Catholics. I believe because the catholics refused to become boundary commissionaires, this meant that the Protestants took over their jobs making them more powerful. Because of this, Catholics lost the right to vote, be represented or even buy a house. By 1969 Catholics were ti red of Protestants having all the power so they wanted Civil Rights. They showed this by violent and non-violent protests. Concluding my theory this is a truthful source that could lead to violence.Source GSource G is a protestants view of Catholics attacking Protestants from 1641. The image shows Catholics dressed in clothes carrying swards forcefully pushing the shamed Protestants that have been stripped of all clothing. The scene shows violence, as there are bodies lying on the floor looking as though they are either in great pain or dead. in that location are some strong words above the picture The Catholics are forcing the English Protestants to be Irish turned into the mountains, whereof many a(prenominal) hundreds are perished, The Catholics are test the Protestants, to analyze whether they are strong enough to become Irish. It goes on to say Now you are wild Irish men as we this tells us that the author believes that Catholics expression so strongly towards their relig ion that they will do anything for it.Does Source G Show Why Violence Broke Out in 1969?This source is unreliable because it is a drawn picture that only shows a biased point of view. However this does give us a possibly exaggerated image of how the Protestants were treated by Catholics. Source G shows violence drawn 330 years before the troubles of 1969. This source could lead to violence because the Protestants may want revenge, and considering that there were many pictures like this one drawn in the 1600s we have to understand that these images could have been used as propaganda against the Catholics. It is small things like this that helped toward the outbreak in 1969.Source HSource H is a photograph of Royal Ulster Constabulary offices trying to take charge of an out of control civil rights meet on the 5th of October 1968, in Derry. The photo shows a couple of Catholics so they may have been the hard to deal with trouble makers who took it too far, but they are screen their h eads and trying to run away whilst the RUC (Protestants) are in charge. From the source we know that the Protestants used violence to stop this march. But were they forced into using violence? Was it the only way they could get to the Catholic protesters? However from the source we are led to understand that the Catholics are weaponless, and that they are not fighting back.The Catholics have obviously started this march because they are unhappy about the way that they are treated.Does Source H Show Why Violence Broke Out in 1969?Because source H is a photograph we know that it is a fact. However from it, like any photos, we have a snapshot from only a few seconds of the whole civil rights march we do not know what happened before or after this photograph was taken. Because of this we can only guess why the RUC had to lead to violence. No one is going to understand who started the fight from this source, or why it lead to what looks like horrific violence. From what we know source H contains violence and as it was taken in 1968 just one year before the outbreak in 1969 this source could of definitely lead to violence. I would say that this source is accurate to some extent but because it is just a few moments worth it is still fairly unreliable. In comparison this photograph is pure fact no matter how a lot information it can give us.Source IThis source is a photograph of a peaceful civil rights march in 1968. underneath the source it tells us the economic demands of the protestors One house, one man, one job. By this time period all Catholics wanted an equal, civilized society. The picture shows police standing(a) calmly as it seems that there is no trouble to be expected. From the source we can see that the march is a well organized non-violent protest.Does Source I Show Why Violence Broke Out in 1969?Because this is a photo we know that it is a fact, however this photo contains the very opposite to source H. Although the scene looks like a peaceful civil ri ghts protest it could have stormed into violence at any minute, therefore I cannot trust this source. If this protest was created after the march in source H the conditions would have improved but personally I believe that Source I was taken before source H. I feel this way because after the Catholics had tried to protest in a peaceful manner they were still not listened to, so they would have got intense and therefore turned to violence to show that they are serious. My theory would also explain why this source the could of led to the trouble in 1969. This source is accurate yet unreliable because we do not have enough data.ConclusionI believe that although not all the sources were entirely reliable, they would all be pretty useful towards why the troubles broke out in 1969. The only source that I found entirely reliable was source F because it gives us verbalise facts containing accurate data. Sources H and I are both photographs and although they are both also facts, they cont ain image proof and dates and to me they show the clearest ideas as to what happened, they are however fairly unreliable because as I mentioned earlier we do not know what happened before or after the photo was taken. Sources D, E and G are all biased, therefore they are not bound to be truthful and are exaggerated facts.Although because of these sources we now know how people were made to think about Protestants and Catholics. We understand that biased points of views were spread about the two different religions as if it were propaganda, this could have also led to some of the violence in 1969. Personally I feel that sources D, E and G show how people have spread thoughts and feelings and brainwashed the rest of the country into civil war, as well as clearly showing the religious tensions that has lead to riots, bombing terrorism and violence. Overall on their own these sources did not give sufficient evidence to tell us why the trouble broke out in 1969, we needed more evidence about why the Easter Rising corrupted. In comparison I feel that when combined the sources are rather reliable.

Examining “Don’t Eat This Book” Essay

Morgan Spurlocks book is an bystanding bill of indictment on the great unwasheds eating habits and a marginally effective indictment of the big food industry. The priming for this half and half success is that while Spurlock does properly show that people are guilty of making poor decisiveness that lead to obesity, he falters when he tries to place a large volume of the blame of the life-size Food industry.While enceinte Food is definitely not the friend to people looking to lose weight as the striking Food industry places an amoral desire to boost profits at the risks of health, the bottom source is (and al fashions will be) Big Food loses all its power when people cease to consume and people simply refuse to cease consuming.Spurlock does point out that there is only one method designed to lose weight reduce calorie consumption either by reducing the amount that is eaten (a respectable idea), increasing exercise (better idea), reducing food consumption and replace the bad fo od that is consumed with high quality food while increasing ones activity level (the best plan of action). Spurlock confronts people with their decided lack of exercise and challenges people to get up and move He also confronts people with their food choices.Where Spurlock succeeds magnificently is he enlightens people who may be somewhat confused as to why they cannot lose weight even though they watch over fad diets and manage back on their consumption. By pointing out to people that most fad diets are designed to drop water weight and scud people into thinking they lost fill in as well as pointing out that eating food high in sugar and fat mover higher calories, Spurlock shifts peoples focus on where it belongs when it comes to diet. Their focus belongs on the basics proper diet and exercise is the cure.Spurlock also successfully points out the reason why fast food is a surefire path to obesity because the processed nature of such food is a recipe for disaster. In a in trut h interesting sidebar, Spurlock shows the sociological reasons why Big Food became as powerful as it is and how deceptive marketing leads to consumption. However, where Spurlock falters is in the silly belief that my regulating Big Food will yield results. To support his philosophy on this, he compares big tobacco to big food. On the surface, the comparison lines sense because emotionally we care to see Big Food punished.When we think about the situation logically, we realize that the fault lies not in big food but in ourselves. The comparisons amid Big Tobacco and Big Food are compelling on an emotional level, but there are some flaws in terms of the logic. Big tobacco was far more complicit in perpetrating a deadly fraud on the population as opposed to Big Food that merely cut corners that yield a higher fat and sugar content. That is, Big Tobacco knew full well that laughingstocks were addictive and the tobacco companies also knew that cigarettes caused cancer, heart disease, etc.To make a bad situation worse, Big Tobacco companies increased and manipulated the levels of addictive nicotine in cigarettes in order to hook smokers. Eventually, the lie was exposed and the number of cigarette smokers in the United States has dropped from 54% of the population in 1964 to slight than 25% today. When the truth about cigarettes was discovered, the sales of cigarettes declined dramatically. With Big Food, the truth was never hidden and when confronted with the truth, no one cared and the consumption continued.When it comes to Big Food, the problem of obesity not only lies in the fact that refined and artificial sugars, flavors and fats, all of which were designed to lower be and increasing profits. The ancillary result of this is that calories will dramatically increase when natural products are replaced with refined products. This DOES NOT mean that the natural products are safe embr make sugar and saturated fat are high in calories and will lead to obesity m uch in the same was as refined sugar and trans fat will.Furthermore, no one is so open to believe that McDonalds food will not make a person fat nor is anyone naive enough to believe it is healthy. Spurlock attempts to use the shimmy of the two overweight girls in NYC as an example of how big food should be sued in the same way that big tobacco was sued due to complicity in the health problems of smokers. The case of the overweight girls was thrown out of court and for good reason the girls were STILL overweight when the case was filed. They had never reeled in their food consumption habits and were looking to blame someone for their problems.Spurlock attempted to portray these girls as martyrs and it simply doesnt work. As a sociological look at the over consumption of food and as a common sense approach to diet and weight loss, Spurlocks tome is outstanding. As an indictment of the Big Food industry, it is only dissociateially successful. oerall, it is a classic study of human nature that only comes along one in a generation. savoir-faire There is an inherent problem that is part of human nature. That problem is the concept that if something brings pleasure, then it essential be consumed. There is also another item that is part of human nature.That item is logic and reasoning. By logic and reasoning, we understand that something feels good because in our own minds, we make it feel good. We also understand that within our own minds, we define certain feelings as negative. The problem is that we accept things that feel good for the moment that lead to much misery and pain in the long run. Over consumption of food will make a person feel good for the 15 minutes that it takes to consume an abominable meal at a McDonalds. When we over consume like this three times a day, seven days a week, we derive a combined amount of pleasure that equals less than four hours.The remaining hours in the weeks, months, years are left with the pain that comes from the obesit y derived limitations on our social lives, our physical well being and our mental health. When a person stops to think about it, that isnt pleasure at all. The consumed food is a mere diversion from a life that is ultimately especial(a) and a limited life is a miserable one. What Mr. Spurlock points out is that if we stay away from the diet pills, stay away from the fad diets, refrain from feeding the Big Food machine with out dollars and cents, we can ultimately live a life that is free from the shackles of obesity.However, what we ask here is something that only a mature large(p) will understand and children are not mature adults. When a child grows up ingesting food that will ultimately make them sick, the adults who allow such things must be held accountable. Whether it is parents or school officials, there needs to be an external pressure designed to be sure that they place the welfare of the children taking the indulgent way out. As adults, as Mr.Spurlock shows, it is our r esponsibility to make the younger generation understand that the pleasure they receive from sugar rushes or the effect laboratory engineered trans fat has on the tastes buds is not real pleasure as it is a transitory gateway to a very limited and miserable life. We must educate and we must pressure and we must be successful at this or the negative cycle that has enveloped young children since the early 1970s will be an unbroken cycle. hunt Cited Morgan Spurlock, Dont Eat This Book, New York Putnams Sons, 2005.

Spirituality and Strength

My Strengths Strength is a word that is greatly misinterpreted. Strength is to overcome ch totally(prenominal)enges that you face and to grow from them. To most, readiness only comes in corporal form, turn for others strength comes emotionally as well as spiritually. One stop be small yet strong or one can even be scared yet strong. Strength has no set rules or requirements. Strength is going against all odds to end up prevailing. cosmos physically strong is the ability to sustain the capacity of a force without breaking or yielding.To be mentally strong is to emerge with confidence by an emotional series of events. For one to be spiritually strong they must take a crap faith in what you believe when the odds are stacked against you. Everyone in life story strives to be strong. Why? It is human nature. Physical strength is to prevail through obstacles that test your body to its limits. Physical strength is shakeing a sickness such as skin cancer. Listening to the doctors t ell me that the chances of living a long healthy life are non excellent. After telling me all this they expect me to be that same person who was lways there for others.But who was there for me? Physical strength is fighting the never ending battle of drowsiness, when I was diagnosed with mononucleosis. This was a insoluble battle when I had so many things to do in so little quantify, Meyer 2 with no energy to spare. Yet, all I wanted to do was to fall into a deep sleep and escape all my responsibilities for the moment. Physical strength is being the strongest that I can be. This is waking up six days a week at the first light of day and pushing my body to its limits at the gym surrounded by other bodies dripping of sweat.It is to fight the endless struggle of laziness of a typical college student and workout even when I have had a long day, with few hours of sleep, and no time in my schedule. Physical strength is a daunting task to seek out but with hard work and perseverance i t can be achieved. amiable strength is the ability to overcome hardship, pain, and suffering. The ability to use those experiences from depression in a positive way, to grow and develop from the most painful situations imaginable. That is what mental strength is all about. I have always been told that the strongest are always most successful.My success is the new person that I have become. I ignore the faultfinding(prenominal) looks and comments made by those I love and those I hate. I handle being ridiculed and gossiped about by those, who in the past, I had put all my avow in. Mental strength is dealing with the drama and stress of high school. It deports strength to walk down those cramped hallways entirely and be watched by those who I utilize to be able to call my friends, and having no one to talk to. Even though I feel as though I am alone within a crowd of faces and shadows, bumping into me, trying to knock me down I do not get intimidated.On weekdays at six in the mor ning I look in the mirror and plaster on a brave face to fool others into thinking that nothing is wrong. I have the strength to not fall in to the deadly trap that people lay out when they make fun of you have with everyone and with yourself. Spiritual strength is the will to believe when all others do not. It is the fight for faith, something that could be imaginary, but that I see as real. It is the urge to die for what I believe in. I maintain my strength while I am tested on my faith in God by countless people, Judging me for following and acting on my beliefs in God.I would earlier die protecting my spirituality then drop dead a lie full of regret. In my times of trouble I have come to transact God is the light, the truth, and the way when all other paths are taken over with darkness. My strength is overcoming the hardship of following the unknown and not knowing where it will take me. It is putting my faith trust in God, and praying when I feel scared or upset. Every Sunda y morning and Wednesday night I devote myself to the life of the church, the body, and the blood of Jesus Christ. Some say that by having spiritual strength I am condemning myself.On the contrary, in having spiritual strength I am freeing myself to a life full of Joy and happiness. Above all, to have spiritual strength is to have faith, love, patience, dedication and hope in God. In conclusion, there are three types of strength I have exhibited throughout my life physical, mental, and spiritual. To have physical strength is to excel in challenges that are made upon the body. To have mental strength is to when my limits are tested. To have spiritual strength is to stick to what I believe is morally right in life. These strengths tie into how I live my life day by day.

Married Women On Condom Use Health And Social Care Essay

This survey aims to research perceptual ingest and attitude of wed bounteous females on rubber usage to envision human immunodeficiency virus & A AIDS, and to understand how this perceptual experience and attitudes influence rubber usage pattern among unify bounteous females. However, there are some prohibitions of this survey. The restriction of this survey is on the range of country, figure of respondent who interviewed and besides in term of the limited clip to carry on the survey. Therefore, the consequence and decisions must be considered as preliminary findings.5.1. DecisionSpecific decisions of this survey are as fol bluesThis survey finds that human immunodeficiency virus & A AIDS cognition on married adult females is execrable. The deplorable human immunodeficiency virus cognition is caused by limited entree of married adult females on HIV & A AIDS training, so they merely get the HIV information from telecasting particularly intelligence and some documentaries, such as soap opera, which is the quality of the information, is sometimes inaccurate.The aim from this survey shows that married adult females realise low hazard perceptual experience because they belief that they do nt make something in hazard, or they said they belief their hubby, so they non make pattern safer sex ( condom usage ) . This low perceptual experience is caused by low cognition of HIV and neer sees people who have HIV make married adult females feel that HIV is happened in other people, non in them.This survey finds that rubber cognition on married adult females is low. Percept that rubber is something absurd is iodine of the manner married adult females show that rubber is something unusual and unfamiliar for them. The other misperception is for married adult females, rubber is indistinguishable with contraceptive method, even though rubber usage in FSW, and they still think it related to forestall gestation. In add-on, from star of focal point group treatment in low instruction and immature married adult females, they raised the sentiment that another sort of contraceptive method method besides has the similar map as rubber to forestall HIV & A AIDS transmittal.The determination from this survey shows that the high degree of instruction, more likely to hold self efficaciousness that continue the manner of communication, they feel more confident to discourse with the partner round gender, include communicating about HIV and rubber usage. While the respondent from low degree instruction told that for them, discourse about rubber to conserve is forbidden. However, in term of rubber usage, they shag negociate to conserve, but the concluding determination is depend on the hubby, and in the degree of attitude this survey found some married adult females agree to utilize rubber for double protection, but when one ask about their purpose to utilize rubber, they said the have no purpose at all to utilize rubber because hubby do nt concupi scence to utilize rubber. This statement make clear that in the twosome relationship particularly matrimony, hubby is have a strong influence on determination doing procedure related rubber usage. This related to sentiment of married adult females that work forces is a family leader, and married adult females have belief that the good married woman is who follow what hubby want.This survey found that no 1 usage rubber to forestall HIV & A AIDS. Even though they who have possible high hazard, cipher usage rubber to forestall HIV & A AIDS. The ground of non utilizing rubbers is varied, that is they feel non at hazard so no petition to utilize rubber to forestall HIV & A AIDS, hubby do nt desire to utilize rubber, rubber usage struggle with the desire to reproduction, rubber pile do some practical job, rubber interrupt sexual activity. However, married adult females raised some ground or state of affairs they volition be agree to utilize rubber, when they can non utilize another sort of prophylactic method except rubber, or in the state of affairs they do non utilize any other prophylactic methods ( for illustration after giving birth ) , when they perceived a demand of protection from the disease, and for funny reasoned.5.2 Recommendations5.2.1 Policy RecommendationsBased on the findings, cognition on HIV/AIDS on married adult females is remains low, it is related to limited entree of married adult females on HIV & A AIDS information. The Ministry of Health, HIV/AIDS Commission and NGOs should beef up runs or circulating information and cognition on HIV/AIDS with telecasting, wireless, cyberspace or web site, newspaper, and magazine to increase married adult females s cognition.The findings revealed that married adult females cognition of rubber is really low, this taking to misperception about rubber. Almost of married adult females identify rubber as prophylactic method, non in the disease bar country. The Ministry of Health, HIV/AIDS Commission and NG Os should beef up runs or circulating information and cognition on rubber usage through telecasting, wireless, cyberspace or web site, newspaper, and magazine to increase adult females s cognition.The determination shows work forces have a large part on determination doing procedure on rubber usage in all features of married adult females. The Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, AIDS Commission and content Family Planning and Population Board should beef up promote information, instruction and communicating and behavior alteration communicating plans which target high hazard adult male which can assist them increase their cognition about safe sex including STIs and HIV/AIDS. And besides adult females s authorization plans are really of import to better their ability to pass on with their hubbies on sexual behaviour and safe sex. Therefore, the Ministry of Women Empowerment and tike Protection, NGOs ( Non-Governmental Organizations ) and societal groups should carry on adult females s empowerment plans.The determination shows that perceived hazard of HIV & A AIDS among married adult females is low, and no 1 in this survey utilizing rubber even have purpose to utilize rubber to forestall HIV & A AIDS. The Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, AIDS Commission and National Family Planning and Population Board should beef up promote information, instruction and communicating and behavior alteration communicating plans which target married adult females which can assist them increase their cognition about safe sex including HIV/AIDS, particularly foregrounding the exposure of adult females who get HIV infection from gentle spouses which can promote them to hold safe sexual behaviour. It can promote and advance gender equity and generative wellness rights.5.2.2 Recommendations for Further ResearchsResearch on status, cognition, perceptual experience, attitude, and behaviour on the married adult females is still limited, particularly among high hazard adult male s regular spouses whose hazard perceptual experience is low but whose hazard is related to the behaviour of their hubby. Including rubber usage as one of HIV & A AIDS bar methods will hold back the image in turn toing married adult females s job and demands sing their sexual behaviour.Future research has to analyze and turn to affectional and contextual issues in disease spread and bar in context of matrimony, including household wellness and cultural facet of gender and power, in the attempts to hold the spread of HIV infection.